Mexico vs Rwanda: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Mexico
15,784 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
18,551 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
82nd
Rwanda rank
79th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Mexico
  • Rwanda
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 18,551 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 15,784 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 2,767 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 82nd and Rwanda ranks 79th of 200 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 271.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 152.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 118.99 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 1,228 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 679.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 548.43 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 4,393 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 159.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,234 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 12,327 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,550 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,778 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 16,880 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,097 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,783 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 17,626 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,641 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,984 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Mexico or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 18,551 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 15,784 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Mexico and Rwanda?
2,767 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Rwanda rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Mexico ranks 82nd and Rwanda ranks 79th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Rwanda: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mexico/rwanda/">Mexico vs Rwanda: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.