Mali vs Nepal: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Mali
575.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
521.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
165th
Nepal rank
166th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Mali
  • Nepal
05001.0k1.5k197119972023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 575.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 521.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 53.83 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Mali ahead.

Mali ranks 165th and Nepal ranks 166th of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 1.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0.9391 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0.4249 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mali
1980s 1.86 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.29 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.42 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
1990s 20.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 77.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 57.44 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
2000s 151.3 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 48.54 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 102.76 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mali
2010s 352.24 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 688.02 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 335.79 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Nepal
2020s 531.64 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 808.92 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 277.27 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Mali or Nepal?
Mali, at 575.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 521.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Mali and Nepal?
53.83 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Nepal?
47 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Mali and Nepal rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Mali ranks 165th and Nepal ranks 166th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Nepal: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mali/nepal/">Mali vs Nepal: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.