Jordan vs North Macedonia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Jordan
22,595 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
25,436 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
72nd
North Macedonia rank
69th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Jordan
  • North Macedonia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197219972023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 25,436 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 22,595 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 2,841 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Jordan ranks 72nd and North Macedonia ranks 69th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,625 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,985 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 359.86 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 18,455 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,448 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,007 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 17,702 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16,001 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,700 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 12,250 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21,804 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,554 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Jordan or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 25,436 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 22,595 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Jordan and North Macedonia?
2,841 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and North Macedonia?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Jordan and North Macedonia rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Jordan ranks 72nd and North Macedonia ranks 69th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs North Macedonia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/north-macedonia/">Jordan vs North Macedonia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.