Jamaica vs Sweden: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Jamaica
45,467 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
45,850 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
50th
Sweden rank
49th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Jamaica
  • Sweden
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019962023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 45,850 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 45,467 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 383 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 50th and Sweden ranks 49th of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 4,956 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 188.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,767 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 727.61 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,695 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 967.05 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 16,255 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 33,203 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 16,948 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 63,127 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 54,415 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,712 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 56,146 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 17,642 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 38,504 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 32,242 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 91,304 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 59,062 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Jamaica or Sweden?
Sweden, at 45,850 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 45,467 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Jamaica and Sweden?
383 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Sweden?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Sweden rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Jamaica ranks 50th and Sweden ranks 49th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Sweden: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/sweden/">Jamaica vs Sweden: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.