IDA total vs Poland: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

IDA total
2,102 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
116,433 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA total rank
32nd
Poland rank
31st

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • IDA total
  • Poland
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019962023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 116,433 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,102 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total, a difference of 114,331 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 55.4 times IDA total's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was IDA total ahead.

IDA total ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 31st of 47 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, IDA total averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA total Poland Difference Ahead
1970s 52.52 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 53.87 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Poland
1980s 61.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 50.61 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre IDA total
1990s 194.55 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,287 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,092 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2000s 912.88 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 40,641 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 39,728 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2010s 1,949 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 49,939 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 47,990 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Poland
2020s 1,831 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 110,272 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 108,441 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, IDA total or Poland?
Poland, at 116,433 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,102 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in IDA total as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between IDA total and Poland?
114,331 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Poland?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do IDA total and Poland rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
IDA total ranks 32nd and Poland ranks 31st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA total vs Poland: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-total/poland/">IDA total vs Poland: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.