Guatemala vs Uganda: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Guatemala
15,400 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
14,929 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
83rd
Uganda rank
85th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Uganda
-10.0k010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 15,400 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 14,929 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 471 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 83rd and Uganda ranks 85th of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Uganda Difference Ahead
1970s 550.86 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 547.4 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 1,012 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2.48 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,010 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 3,261 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 454.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,807 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 806.74 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,193 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,386 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 10,684 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,649 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,035 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 18,036 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,954 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,082 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Guatemala or Uganda?
Guatemala, at 15,400 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 14,929 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Guatemala and Uganda?
471 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Uganda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Uganda rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Guatemala ranks 83rd and Uganda ranks 85th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Uganda: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/uganda/">Guatemala vs Uganda: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.