Eswatini vs Mongolia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Eswatini
1,636 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
1,442 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
143rd
Mongolia rank
146th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mongolia
-2.5k02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197219972023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1,636 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,442 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 194 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 143rd and Mongolia ranks 146th of 200 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mongolia Difference Ahead
1980s 1,253 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0.0113 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,253 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 3,965 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,956 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 2,944 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 173.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,771 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 3,071 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 947.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,123 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 2,807 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,387 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,420 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Eswatini or Mongolia?
Eswatini, at 1,636 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,442 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Eswatini and Mongolia?
194 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mongolia?
41 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Mongolia rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 143rd and Mongolia ranks 146th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mongolia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mongolia/">Eswatini vs Mongolia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.