Czechia vs Late-demographic dividend: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Czechia
154,102 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend
3,045 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
26th
Late-demographic dividend rank
29th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Czechia
  • Late-demographic dividend
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197019962023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 154,102 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,045 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 151,057 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Czechia's figure about 50.6 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 26th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 29th of 200 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Late-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1990s 31,124 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,009 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 98,806 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,131 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 92,675 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 106,321 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,765 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 92,556 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2020s 137,476 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,066 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 128,409 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Czechia or Late-demographic dividend?
Czechia, at 154,102 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,045 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Czechia and Late-demographic dividend?
151,057 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Late-demographic dividend?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Czechia ranks 26th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 29th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Late-demographic dividend: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/late-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/late-demographic-dividend/">Czechia vs Late-demographic dividend: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.