Congo vs Eswatini: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Congo
1,834 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
1,636 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
141st
Eswatini rank
143rd

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Congo
  • Eswatini
-5.0k05.0k10.0k15.0k197019962023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1,834 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,636 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 198 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 141st and Eswatini ranks 143rd of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Eswatini Difference Ahead
1970s 80.89 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 896.06 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 815.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 81.35 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,547 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,465 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 68.85 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,743 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,675 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 2,087 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,944 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 857.51 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 5,317 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,071 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,246 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s -837.96 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,807 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,645 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Congo or Eswatini?
Congo, at 1,834 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,636 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Congo and Eswatini?
198 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eswatini?
52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Congo and Eswatini rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Congo ranks 141st and Eswatini ranks 143rd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Eswatini: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/eswatini/">Congo vs Eswatini: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.