Cape Verde vs Norway: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Cape Verde
39,389 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
37,844 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
53rd
Norway rank
56th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Norway
-50.0k050.0k100.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 39,389 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 37,844 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 1,545 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Norway ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 53rd and Norway ranks 56th of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 0 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,514 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,514 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 88.07 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,070 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 982.06 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 3,356 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,094 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,738 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 22,470 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27,266 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,796 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 29,204 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 18,310 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,893 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 27,285 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 29,605 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,321 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Cape Verde or Norway?
Cape Verde, at 39,389 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 37,844 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Cape Verde and Norway?
1,545 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Norway?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Norway rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Cape Verde ranks 53rd and Norway ranks 56th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Norway: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/norway/">Cape Verde vs Norway: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.