Botswana vs Mongolia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Botswana
1,308 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
1,442 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
148th
Mongolia rank
146th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Botswana
  • Mongolia
-2.0k02.0k197419982023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 1,442 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,308 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 134 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 148th and Mongolia ranks 146th of 200 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mongolia Difference Ahead
1980s 104.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 0.0113 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 104.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 12.32 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3.15 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 606.43 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 173.04 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 433.38 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 423.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 947.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 524.1 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 513.43 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,387 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 873.88 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Botswana or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 1,442 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,308 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Botswana and Mongolia?
134 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mongolia?
41 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Mongolia rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Botswana ranks 148th and Mongolia ranks 146th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Mongolia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mongolia/">Botswana vs Mongolia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.