Australia vs Tunisia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square

Australia
4,591 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
4,541 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
114th
Tunisia rank
115th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square over time

  • Australia
  • Tunisia
-5.0k05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019962023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 4,591 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,541 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 50 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 114th and Tunisia ranks 115th of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 134.98 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 351.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 216.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 508.66 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,011 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 502.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 800.7 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,303 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,502 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 2,814 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,186 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,372 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 6,686 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,189 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 496.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 4,987 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,054 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 933.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square, Australia or Tunisia?
Australia, at 4,591 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,541 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square between Australia and Tunisia?
50 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Australia and Tunisia rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per square?
Australia ranks 114th and Tunisia ranks 115th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Tunisia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/tunisia/">Australia vs Tunisia: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 11,736 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.