Namibia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita

Namibia
638.56 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
604.22 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2025
Namibia rank
56th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
57th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita over time

  • Namibia
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
01.0k2.0k3.0k198020022025

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 638.56 BoP, current US$ per person against 604.22 BoP, current US$ per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 34.34 BoP, current US$ per person.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Namibia ranks 56th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 57th of 202 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 4.22 BoP, current US$ per person 427.14 BoP, current US$ per person 422.92 BoP, current US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 59.9 BoP, current US$ per person 652.39 BoP, current US$ per person 592.49 BoP, current US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 214.11 BoP, current US$ per person 2,007 BoP, current US$ per person 1,793 BoP, current US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 215.96 BoP, current US$ per person 2,183 BoP, current US$ per person 1,967 BoP, current US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 404.46 BoP, current US$ per person 577.43 BoP, current US$ per person 172.98 BoP, current US$ per person Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita, Namibia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Namibia, at 638.56 BoP, current US$ per person against 604.22 BoP, current US$ per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita between Namibia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
34.34 BoP, current US$ per person, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
40 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2024.
How do Namibia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita?
Namibia ranks 56th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 57th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-capita/namibia/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-capita/namibia/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Namibia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita
Unit
BoP, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,254 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.