Guyana vs Hong Kong, China: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita

Guyana
10,383 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2024
Hong Kong, China
16,722 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2024
Guyana rank
6th
Hong Kong, China rank
5th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita over time

  • Guyana
  • Hong Kong, China
010.0k20.0k197019972024

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 16,722 BoP, current US$ per person against 10,383 BoP, current US$ per person in Guyana, a difference of 6,339 BoP, current US$ per person.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.6 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guyana ahead.

Guyana ranks 6th and Hong Kong, China ranks 5th of 202 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1970s 3.74 BoP, current US$ per person 58.76 BoP, current US$ per person 55.03 BoP, current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1980s 1.24 BoP, current US$ per person 388.22 BoP, current US$ per person 386.98 BoP, current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1990s 81.78 BoP, current US$ per person 1,425 BoP, current US$ per person 1,343 BoP, current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2000s 118.28 BoP, current US$ per person 6,123 BoP, current US$ per person 6,005 BoP, current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 697.08 BoP, current US$ per person 14,529 BoP, current US$ per person 13,832 BoP, current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 1,939 BoP, current US$ per person 16,756 BoP, current US$ per person 14,817 BoP, current US$ per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita, Guyana or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 16,722 BoP, current US$ per person against 10,383 BoP, current US$ per person in Guyana as of 2024.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita between Guyana and Hong Kong, China?
6,339 BoP, current US$ per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Hong Kong, China?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Guyana and Hong Kong, China rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita?
Guyana ranks 6th and Hong Kong, China ranks 5th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Hong Kong, China: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-capita/guyana/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-capita/guyana/hong-kong-sar-china/">Guyana vs Hong Kong, China: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita
Unit
BoP, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,254 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.