Equatorial Guinea vs Mozambique: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita

Equatorial Guinea
99.34 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2024
Mozambique
101.31 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
112th
Mozambique rank
110th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Mozambique
-1.0k01.0k2.0k197019972024

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 101.31 BoP, current US$ per person against 99.34 BoP, current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.97 BoP, current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Mozambique ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 112th and Mozambique ranks 110th of 202 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Mozambique Difference Ahead
1970s -0.0723 BoP, current US$ per person 0.1884 BoP, current US$ per person 0.2607 BoP, current US$ per person Mozambique
1980s 3.95 BoP, current US$ per person 0.1561 BoP, current US$ per person 3.8 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 179.43 BoP, current US$ per person 5.49 BoP, current US$ per person 173.94 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 626.62 BoP, current US$ per person 18.97 BoP, current US$ per person 607.64 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 783.38 BoP, current US$ per person 141.58 BoP, current US$ per person 641.8 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 251.96 BoP, current US$ per person 108.84 BoP, current US$ per person 143.12 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 101.31 BoP, current US$ per person against 99.34 BoP, current US$ per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique?
1.97 BoP, current US$ per person, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique?
45 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Mozambique rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 112th and Mozambique ranks 110th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Mozambique: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-capita/equatorial-guinea/mozambique/">Equatorial Guinea vs Mozambique: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita
Unit
BoP, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,254 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.