Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita

Congo
95.31 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
99.34 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2024
Congo rank
114th
Equatorial Guinea rank
112th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita over time

  • Congo
  • Equatorial Guinea
-1.0k01.0k2.0k197019972024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 99.34 BoP, current US$ per person against 95.31 BoP, current US$ per person in Congo, a difference of 4.03 BoP, current US$ per person.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 114th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 112th of 202 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 2.32 BoP, current US$ per person -0.0723 BoP, current US$ per person 2.39 BoP, current US$ per person Congo
1980s 13.2 BoP, current US$ per person 3.95 BoP, current US$ per person 9.25 BoP, current US$ per person Congo
1990s 10.14 BoP, current US$ per person 179.43 BoP, current US$ per person 169.3 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 178.98 BoP, current US$ per person 626.62 BoP, current US$ per person 447.64 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 356.67 BoP, current US$ per person 783.38 BoP, current US$ per person 426.71 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s -22.85 BoP, current US$ per person 251.96 BoP, current US$ per person 274.81 BoP, current US$ per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 99.34 BoP, current US$ per person against 95.31 BoP, current US$ per person in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
4.03 BoP, current US$ per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
45 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2024.
How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), per capita?
Congo ranks 114th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 112th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-capita/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-per-capita/congo-rep/equatorial-guinea/">Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita
Unit
BoP, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,254 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.