Jordan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled

Jordan
1.63 billion BoP, current US$
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
1.72 billion BoP, current US$
in 2024
Jordan rank
81st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
78th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Jordan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B197019972024

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 1.72 billion BoP, current US$ against 1.63 billion BoP, current US$ in Jordan, a difference of 82.93 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Jordan ranks 81st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 78th of 202 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 4 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 15.21 million BoP, current US$ 4.30 million BoP, current US$ 10.90 million BoP, current US$ Jordan
1980s 45.60 million BoP, current US$ 5.01 million BoP, current US$ 40.60 million BoP, current US$ Jordan
1990s 89.35 million BoP, current US$ 119.95 million BoP, current US$ 30.60 million BoP, current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 1.63 billion BoP, current US$ 642.51 million BoP, current US$ 987.42 million BoP, current US$ Jordan
2010s 1.57 billion BoP, current US$ 1.38 billion BoP, current US$ 187.34 million BoP, current US$ Jordan
2020s 1.20 billion BoP, current US$ 1.39 billion BoP, current US$ 190.54 million BoP, current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled, Jordan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 1.72 billion BoP, current US$ against 1.63 billion BoP, current US$ in Jordan as of 2024.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled between Jordan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
82.93 million BoP, current US$, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
53 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2024.
How do Jordan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
Jordan ranks 81st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 78th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/jordan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/jordan/tanzania/">Jordan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,316 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) with 62 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.