Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled

Hong Kong, China
125.82 billion BoP, current US$
in 2024
OECD members
777.22 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd
OECD members rank
4th

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • OECD members
0500.0B1.0T1.5T2.0T2.5T197019972025

How they compare

OECD members currently reports 777.22 billion BoP, current US$ against 125.82 billion BoP, current US$ in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 651.40 billion BoP, current US$.

That makes OECD members's figure about 6.2 times Hong Kong, China's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, OECD members has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and OECD members ranks 4th of 202 countries.

OECD members has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 267.64 million BoP, current US$ 18.59 billion BoP, current US$ 18.33 billion BoP, current US$ OECD members
1980s 2.13 billion BoP, current US$ 76.87 billion BoP, current US$ 74.73 billion BoP, current US$ OECD members
1990s 9.03 billion BoP, current US$ 334.83 billion BoP, current US$ 325.81 billion BoP, current US$ OECD members
2000s 41.86 billion BoP, current US$ 1.15 trillion BoP, current US$ 1.11 trillion BoP, current US$ OECD members
2010s 105.58 billion BoP, current US$ 1.18 trillion BoP, current US$ 1.07 trillion BoP, current US$ OECD members
2020s 124.97 billion BoP, current US$ 756.39 billion BoP, current US$ 631.42 billion BoP, current US$ OECD members

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled, Hong Kong, China or OECD members?
OECD members, at 777.22 billion BoP, current US$ against 125.82 billion BoP, current US$ in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled between Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
651.40 billion BoP, current US$, with OECD members ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and OECD members rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and OECD members ranks 4th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/">Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,316 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) with 62 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.