China vs Post-demographic dividend: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled

China
79.98 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
Post-demographic dividend
821.52 billion BoP, current US$
in 2025
China rank
5th
Post-demographic dividend rank
3rd

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • China
  • Post-demographic dividend
0500.0B1.0T1.5T2.0T2.5T197019972025

How they compare

Post-demographic dividend currently reports 821.52 billion BoP, current US$ against 79.98 billion BoP, current US$ in China, a difference of 741.55 billion BoP, current US$.

That makes Post-demographic dividend's figure about 10.3 times China's.

Across all 47 years both countries report, Post-demographic dividend has been ahead every year.

China ranks 5th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 3rd of 202 countries.

Post-demographic dividend has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Post-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1970s 80,000 BoP, current US$ 34.24 billion BoP, current US$ 34.24 billion BoP, current US$ Post-demographic dividend
1980s 1.51 billion BoP, current US$ 77.02 billion BoP, current US$ 75.51 billion BoP, current US$ Post-demographic dividend
1990s 28.84 billion BoP, current US$ 330.55 billion BoP, current US$ 301.71 billion BoP, current US$ Post-demographic dividend
2000s 95.53 billion BoP, current US$ 1.14 trillion BoP, current US$ 1.04 trillion BoP, current US$ Post-demographic dividend
2010s 232.99 billion BoP, current US$ 1.20 trillion BoP, current US$ 962.24 billion BoP, current US$ Post-demographic dividend
2020s 160.22 billion BoP, current US$ 916.47 billion BoP, current US$ 756.25 billion BoP, current US$ Post-demographic dividend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled, China or Post-demographic dividend?
Post-demographic dividend, at 821.52 billion BoP, current US$ against 79.98 billion BoP, current US$ in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled between China and Post-demographic dividend?
741.55 billion BoP, current US$, with Post-demographic dividend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Post-demographic dividend?
47 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2025.
How do China and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for foreign direct investment, net inflows (bop, current us$), gaps filled?
China ranks 5th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 3rd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Post-demographic dividend: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/china/post-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/foreign-direct-investment-net-inflows-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/china/post-demographic-dividend/">China vs Post-demographic dividend: Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
249 places, 12,316 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) with 62 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.