Iceland vs New Caledonia: Foreign direct investment, net
Foreign direct investment, net over time
- Iceland
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports -650.01 million BoP, current US$ against -702.86 million BoP, current US$ in New Caledonia, a difference of 52.85 million BoP, current US$.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 111th and New Caledonia ranks 114th of 196 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.04 billion BoP, current US$ | -509.04 million BoP, current US$ | 1.55 billion BoP, current US$ | Iceland |
| 2010s | -1.46 billion BoP, current US$ | -1.62 billion BoP, current US$ | 160.38 million BoP, current US$ | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher foreign direct investment, net, Iceland or New Caledonia?
- Iceland, at -650.01 million BoP, current US$ against -702.86 million BoP, current US$ in New Caledonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in foreign direct investment, net between Iceland and New Caledonia?
- 52.85 million BoP, current US$, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and New Caledonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Iceland and New Caledonia rank globally for foreign direct investment, net?
- Iceland ranks 111th and New Caledonia ranks 114th of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Foreign direct investment, net (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Foreign direct investment is a category of cross-border investment associated with a resident in one economy having control or a significant degree of influence on the management of an enterprise that is resident in another economy. Ownership of 10 percent or more of the voting power is evidence of a direct investment relationship. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.