Iceland vs Papua New Guinea: Food, beverages and tobacco
Food, beverages and tobacco over time
- Iceland
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 52.4% against 51.8% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 36th of 157 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 51.2% | 23.0% | 28.2% | Iceland |
| 1970s | 45.0% | 32.9% | 12.1% | Iceland |
| 1980s | 41.3% | 52.1% | 10.8% | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | 42.4% | 51.8% | 9.4% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 40.1% | 51.8% | 11.7% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food, beverages and tobacco, Iceland or Papua New Guinea?
- Iceland, at 52.4% against 51.8% in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food, beverages and tobacco between Iceland and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.6%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Papua New Guinea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2001.
- How do Iceland and Papua New Guinea rank globally for food, beverages and tobacco?
- Iceland ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 36th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Yearbook of Industrial Statistics, UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), published as Food, beverages and tobacco (% of value added in manufacturing). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Manufacturing of food, beverages, and tobacco includes industries classified in ISIC (Rev. 3) divisions 15 and 16. Value added is the contribution to the economy by a producer or an industry or an institutional sector, which is estimated by the total value of output produced and deducting the total value of intermediate consumption of goods and services used to produce that output. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of value added in manufacturing which is the contribution to the economy by the manufacturing sector (ISIC Rev. 3 major division D).