Nepal vs Qatar: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Nepal
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 38.63 billion current LCU against 35.16 billion current LCU in Nepal, a difference of 3.47 billion current LCU.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 23rd and Qatar ranks 22nd of 72 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.73 billion current LCU | 4.98 billion current LCU | 13.75 billion current LCU | Nepal |
| 2010s | 35.16 billion current LCU | 12.73 billion current LCU | 22.43 billion current LCU | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Nepal or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 38.63 billion current LCU against 35.16 billion current LCU in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Nepal and Qatar?
- 3.47 billion current LCU, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Qatar?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2010.
- How do Nepal and Qatar rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Nepal ranks 23rd and Qatar ranks 22nd of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.