Nepal vs New Caledonia: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Nepal
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 35.16 billion current LCU against 26.06 billion current LCU in New Caledonia, a difference of 9.10 billion current LCU.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.3 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Nepal ranks 23rd and New Caledonia ranks 24th of 72 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.73 billion current LCU | 16.97 billion current LCU | 1.76 billion current LCU | Nepal |
| 2010s | 35.16 billion current LCU | 23.19 billion current LCU | 11.97 billion current LCU | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Nepal or New Caledonia?
- Nepal, at 35.16 billion current LCU against 26.06 billion current LCU in New Caledonia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Nepal and New Caledonia?
- 9.10 billion current LCU, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and New Caledonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2010.
- How do Nepal and New Caledonia rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Nepal ranks 23rd and New Caledonia ranks 24th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.