Mexico vs Qatar: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Mexico
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 38.63 billion current LCU against 23.60 billion current LCU in Mexico, a difference of 15.03 billion current LCU.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.6 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Qatar ahead.
Mexico ranks 25th and Qatar ranks 22nd of 72 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.41 billion current LCU | 525.20 million current LCU | 883.70 million current LCU | Mexico |
| 1990s | 14.18 billion current LCU | 699.00 million current LCU | 13.48 billion current LCU | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Mexico or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 38.63 billion current LCU against 23.60 billion current LCU in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Mexico and Qatar?
- 15.03 billion current LCU, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Qatar?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1992.
- How do Mexico and Qatar rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Mexico ranks 25th and Qatar ranks 22nd of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.