Marshall Islands vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)

Marshall Islands
11.33 million current LCU
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
32.85 million current LCU
in 2025
Marshall Islands rank
63rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
60th

Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time

  • Marshall Islands
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M197720012025

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 32.85 million current LCU against 11.33 million current LCU in Marshall Islands, a difference of 21.52 million current LCU.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 2.9 times Marshall Islands's.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.

Marshall Islands ranks 63rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 60th of 72 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Marshall Islands Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1990s 4.11 million current LCU 22.00 million current LCU 17.89 million current LCU Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 5.00 million current LCU 50.83 million current LCU 45.83 million current LCU Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 6.58 million current LCU 24.15 million current LCU 17.57 million current LCU Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 9.50 million current LCU 26.76 million current LCU 17.27 million current LCU Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Marshall Islands or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 32.85 million current LCU against 11.33 million current LCU in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Marshall Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
21.52 million current LCU, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
28 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2024.
How do Marshall Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
Marshall Islands ranks 63rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 60th of 72 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Marshall Islands vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-current-lcu/marshall-islands/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-current-lcu/marshall-islands/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Marshall Islands vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
73 places, 1,613 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.