Malaysia vs Mexico: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Malaysia
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 23.60 billion current LCU against 17.53 billion current LCU in Malaysia, a difference of 6.06 billion current LCU.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 26th and Mexico ranks 25th of 72 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.11 billion current LCU | 3.92 billion current LCU | 191.27 million current LCU | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 6.94 billion current LCU | 14.18 billion current LCU | 7.24 billion current LCU | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Malaysia or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 23.60 billion current LCU against 17.53 billion current LCU in Malaysia as of 1992.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Malaysia and Mexico?
- 6.06 billion current LCU, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Mexico?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 1992.
- How do Malaysia and Mexico rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Malaysia ranks 26th and Mexico ranks 25th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.