Kiribati vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)

Kiribati
16.89 million current LCU
in 2024
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
9.73 million current LCU
in 1999
Kiribati rank
62nd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
65th

Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time

  • Kiribati
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
05.0M10.0M15.0M197720002024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 16.89 million current LCU against 9.73 million current LCU in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 7.16 million current LCU.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.7 times Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 62nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 65th of 72 countries.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1970s 114,000 current LCU 1.24 million current LCU 1.12 million current LCU Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1980s 975,700 current LCU 2.93 million current LCU 1.95 million current LCU Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1990s 1.32 million current LCU 7.64 million current LCU 6.32 million current LCU Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Kiribati or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Kiribati, at 16.89 million current LCU against 9.73 million current LCU in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2024.
What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Kiribati and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
7.16 million current LCU, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
21 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 1999.
How do Kiribati and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
Kiribati ranks 62nd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 65th of 72 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-current-lcu/kiribati/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-current-lcu/kiribati/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Kiribati vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
73 places, 1,613 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.