Kazakhstan vs Kenya: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 466.86 billion current LCU against 342.60 billion current LCU in Kenya, a difference of 124.26 billion current LCU.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.4 times Kenya's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Kenya ranks 11th of 72 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 552.76 billion current LCU | 45.66 billion current LCU | 507.10 billion current LCU | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 466.86 billion current LCU | 85.92 billion current LCU | 380.94 billion current LCU | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Kazakhstan or Kenya?
- Kazakhstan, at 466.86 billion current LCU against 342.60 billion current LCU in Kenya as of 2010.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Kazakhstan and Kenya?
- 124.26 billion current LCU, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kenya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
- How do Kazakhstan and Kenya rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Kazakhstan ranks 10th and Kenya ranks 11th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.