Guyana vs Qatar: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Guyana
- Qatar
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 38.89 billion current LCU against 38.63 billion current LCU in Qatar, a difference of 262.00 million current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 21st and Qatar ranks 22nd of 72 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.94 billion current LCU | 8.10 billion current LCU | 158.00 million current LCU | Qatar |
| 2010s | 16.72 billion current LCU | 21.50 billion current LCU | 4.78 billion current LCU | Qatar |
| 2020s | 27.08 billion current LCU | 39.17 billion current LCU | 12.09 billion current LCU | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Guyana or Qatar?
- Guyana, at 38.89 billion current LCU against 38.63 billion current LCU in Qatar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Guyana and Qatar?
- 262.00 million current LCU, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Qatar?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Guyana and Qatar rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Guyana ranks 21st and Qatar ranks 22nd of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.