Congo vs Kazakhstan: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Congo
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 466.86 billion current LCU against 216.83 billion current LCU in Congo, a difference of 250.03 billion current LCU.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 2.2 times Congo's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 13th and Kazakhstan ranks 10th of 72 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.90 billion current LCU | 475.35 billion current LCU | 442.44 billion current LCU | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 107.00 billion current LCU | 466.86 billion current LCU | 359.86 billion current LCU | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Congo or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 466.86 billion current LCU against 216.83 billion current LCU in Congo as of 2010.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 250.03 billion current LCU, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kazakhstan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
- How do Congo and Kazakhstan rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Congo ranks 13th and Kazakhstan ranks 10th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.