Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sao Tome and Principe: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
697.99 million current LCU
in 2014
Sao Tome and Principe
531.94 million current LCU
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
42nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
45th

Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B200020122025

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 697.99 million current LCU against 531.94 million current LCU in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 166.05 million current LCU.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 42nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 45th of 72 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 679.39 million current LCU 71.36 million current LCU 608.03 million current LCU Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 703.41 million current LCU 281.61 million current LCU 421.80 million current LCU Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sao Tome and Principe?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 697.99 million current LCU against 531.94 million current LCU in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2014.
What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sao Tome and Principe?
166.05 million current LCU, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sao Tome and Principe?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 42nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 45th of 72 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sao Tome and Principe: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-current-lcu/bosnia-and-herzegovina/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/financial-intermediary-services-indirectly-measured-fisim-current-lcu/bosnia-and-herzegovina/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sao Tome and Principe: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
73 places, 1,613 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.