Azerbaijan vs Jordan: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 503.30 million current LCU against 437.50 million current LCU in Azerbaijan, a difference of 65.80 million current LCU.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Azerbaijan's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 47th and Jordan ranks 46th of 72 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.98 million current LCU | 86.86 million current LCU | 62.88 million current LCU | Jordan |
| 2000s | 95.92 million current LCU | 256.45 million current LCU | 160.53 million current LCU | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Azerbaijan or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 503.30 million current LCU against 437.50 million current LCU in Azerbaijan as of 2007.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Azerbaijan and Jordan?
- 65.80 million current LCU, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Jordan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2007.
- How do Azerbaijan and Jordan rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Azerbaijan ranks 47th and Jordan ranks 46th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.