Argentina vs Kuwait: Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM)
Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) over time
- Argentina
- Kuwait
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 3.26 billion current LCU against 1.77 billion current LCU in Argentina, a difference of 1.49 billion current LCU.
That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.8 times Argentina's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 37th and Kuwait ranks 34th of 72 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Kuwait | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.88 billion current LCU | 298.46 million current LCU | 3.58 billion current LCU | Argentina |
| 2000s | 3.51 billion current LCU | 534.00 million current LCU | 2.97 billion current LCU | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim), Argentina or Kuwait?
- Kuwait, at 3.26 billion current LCU against 1.77 billion current LCU in Argentina as of 2025.
- What is the difference in financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim) between Argentina and Kuwait?
- 1.49 billion current LCU, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Kuwait?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2003.
- How do Argentina and Kuwait rank globally for financial intermediary services indirectly measured (fisim)?
- Argentina ranks 37th and Kuwait ranks 34th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Financial intermediation services which are implicitly charged in the form of either the difference between a reference rate and the interest rate actually paid to depositors, or the difference between the interest rate charged to borrowers and a reference rate. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.