Low & middle income vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP

Low & middle income
0.6775 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.9658 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Low & middle income rank
36th
Zimbabwe rank
37th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Zimbabwe
00.250.50.7511.2196019922024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.9658 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.6775 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income, a difference of 0.2883 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 43 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.777 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.854 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0769 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1970s 0.7354 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8101 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0746 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1980s 0.7451 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8438 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0987 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
1990s 0.7553 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8286 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0733 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2000s 0.7038 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.02 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3163 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2010s 0.6652 current US$ per US$ of GDP 1.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3478 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe
2020s 0.6613 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9584 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2971 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per unit of gdp, Low & middle income or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.9658 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.6775 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Low & middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per unit of gdp between Low & middle income and Zimbabwe?
0.2883 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Low & middle income and Zimbabwe rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Low & middle income ranks 36th and Zimbabwe ranks 37th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/low-and-middle-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/low-and-middle-income/zimbabwe/">Low & middle income vs Zimbabwe: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
231 places, 11,115 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.