How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Chile?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burundi vs Chile: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP

Burundi

0.7173 current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Chile

0.718 current US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Burundi rank

139th

Chile rank

138th

Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

Burundi
Chile

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.718 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7173 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Burundi, a difference of 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 139th and Chile ranks 138th of 188 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burundi	Chile	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.9539 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.8414 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1125 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Burundi
1970s	0.967 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.8457 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1214 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Burundi
1980s	0.9686 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.7942 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1744 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Burundi
1990s	1.05 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.7332 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.3193 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Burundi
2000s	1.08 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.7 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.3763 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Burundi
2010s	1.04 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.7416 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.3006 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Burundi
2020s	0.8168 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.7506 current US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0662 current US$ per US$ of GDP	Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per unit of gdp, Burundi or Chile?: Chile, at 0.718 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7173 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Burundi as of 2025.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per unit of gdp between Burundi and Chile?: 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Chile?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Burundi and Chile rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per unit of gdp?: Burundi ranks 139th and Chile ranks 138th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Chile: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/chile/">Burundi vs Chile: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 231 places, 11,115 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 09 September 2026

Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.