Chad vs Malawi: Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per capita
Chad
684.43 current US$ per person
in 2025
Malawi
687.41 current US$ per person
in 2025
Chad rank
180th
Malawi rank
179th
Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per capita over time
- Chad
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 687.41 current US$ per person against 684.43 current US$ per person in Chad, a difference of 2.98 current US$ per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 180th and Malawi ranks 179th of 188 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 670.22 current US$ per person | 518.75 current US$ per person | 151.47 current US$ per person | Chad |
| 2020s | 666.26 current US$ per person | 624.83 current US$ per person | 41.43 current US$ per person | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current us$), per capita, Chad or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 687.41 current US$ per person against 684.43 current US$ per person in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current us$), per capita between Chad and Malawi?
- 2.98 current US$ per person, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Malawi?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Chad and Malawi rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current us$), per capita?
- Chad ranks 180th and Malawi ranks 179th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Final consumption expenditure (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.