Rwanda vs Syria: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Rwanda
564.88 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Syria
566.98 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2022
Rwanda rank
19th
Syria rank
18th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • Syria
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Syria currently reports 566.98 million current LCU per square kilometre against 564.88 million current LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 2.10 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 19th and Syria ranks 18th of 185 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Syria Difference Ahead
1960s 343,459 current LCU per square kilometre 24,608 current LCU per square kilometre 318,851 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 92,419 current LCU per square kilometre 1.39 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 4.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 509,072 current LCU per square kilometre 4.39 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 13.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.46 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.84 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 60.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 53.61 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 223.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 33.60 million current LCU per square kilometre 189.55 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 399.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 289.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 109.30 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Rwanda or Syria?
Syria, at 566.98 million current LCU per square kilometre against 564.88 million current LCU per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2022.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Rwanda and Syria?
2.10 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Syria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Syria?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Rwanda and Syria rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 19th and Syria ranks 18th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Syria: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/syrian-arab-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/syrian-arab-republic/">Rwanda vs Syria: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.