Mali vs Sweden: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Mali
10.64 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
10.86 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali rank
94th
Sweden rank
92nd

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mali
  • Sweden
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 10.86 million current LCU per square kilometre against 10.64 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 214,300 current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 94th and Sweden ranks 92nd of 185 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 60,116 current LCU per square kilometre 285,447 current LCU per square kilometre 225,331 current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 149,238 current LCU per square kilometre 607,974 current LCU per square kilometre 458,736 current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 532,404 current LCU per square kilometre 1.74 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.21 million current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.26 million current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 2.78 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.38 million current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 6.36 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.49 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.13 million current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 9.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.83 million current LCU per square kilometre 323,938 current LCU per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Mali or Sweden?
Sweden, at 10.86 million current LCU per square kilometre against 10.64 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Mali and Sweden?
214,300 current LCU per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sweden?
57 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
How do Mali and Sweden rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Mali ranks 94th and Sweden ranks 92nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Sweden: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mali/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mali/sweden/">Mali vs Sweden: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.