Kenya vs Turkey: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Kenya
22.96 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkey
23.68 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
72nd
Turkey rank
71st

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Kenya
  • Turkey
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M196119922023

How they compare

Turkey currently reports 23.68 million current LCU per square kilometre against 22.96 million current LCU per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 714,300 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.

Kenya ranks 72nd and Turkey ranks 71st of 185 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya Turkey Difference Ahead
1960s 11,152 current LCU per square kilometre 0.0952 current LCU per square kilometre 11,152 current LCU per square kilometre Kenya
1970s 35,916 current LCU per square kilometre 0.754 current LCU per square kilometre 35,915 current LCU per square kilometre Kenya
1980s 145,582 current LCU per square kilometre 54.03 current LCU per square kilometre 145,528 current LCU per square kilometre Kenya
1990s 793,565 current LCU per square kilometre 25,399 current LCU per square kilometre 768,165 current LCU per square kilometre Kenya
2000s 2.66 million current LCU per square kilometre 607,220 current LCU per square kilometre 2.05 million current LCU per square kilometre Kenya
2010s 10.28 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.25 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.03 million current LCU per square kilometre Kenya
2020s 19.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.88 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.60 million current LCU per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Kenya or Turkey?
Turkey, at 23.68 million current LCU per square kilometre against 22.96 million current LCU per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Kenya and Turkey?
714,300 current LCU per square kilometre, with Turkey ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Turkey?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kenya and Turkey rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Kenya ranks 72nd and Turkey ranks 71st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs Turkey: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kenya/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/kenya/turkiye/">Kenya vs Turkey: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.