Iraq vs Rwanda: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Iraq
485.46 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
564.88 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
20th
Rwanda rank
19th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Iraq
  • Rwanda
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 564.88 million current LCU per square kilometre against 485.46 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iraq, a difference of 79.42 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Iraq's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Iraq ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 185 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 5,192 current LCU per square kilometre 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 29,422 current LCU per square kilometre 4.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.87 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 7.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 13.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.23 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 96.93 million current LCU per square kilometre 60.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 36.77 million current LCU per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 334.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 223.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 111.61 million current LCU per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 425.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 440.53 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.44 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Iraq or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 564.88 million current LCU per square kilometre against 485.46 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Iraq and Rwanda?
79.42 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Rwanda?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Rwanda rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Iraq ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 19th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Rwanda: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iraq/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iraq/rwanda/">Iraq vs Rwanda: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.