Iceland vs Nepal: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Iceland
32.04 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
34.74 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
62nd
Nepal rank
61st

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Nepal
010.0M20.0M30.0M197019962023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 34.74 million current LCU per square kilometre against 32.04 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 2.70 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Nepal ahead.

Iceland ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 61st of 185 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 4 and Nepal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Nepal Difference Ahead
1970s 39,114 current LCU per square kilometre 114,592 current LCU per square kilometre 75,477 current LCU per square kilometre Nepal
1980s 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 302,828 current LCU per square kilometre 764,253 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 3.91 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.31 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.60 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 8.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.81 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.08 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 17.11 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.04 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.07 million current LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 27.75 million current LCU per square kilometre 30.29 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.54 million current LCU per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Iceland or Nepal?
Nepal, at 34.74 million current LCU per square kilometre against 32.04 million current LCU per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Iceland and Nepal?
2.70 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Nepal?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Nepal rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 62nd and Nepal ranks 61st of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Nepal: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/iceland/nepal/">Iceland vs Nepal: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.