Hong Kong vs Uzbekistan: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Hong Kong
2.37 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uzbekistan
2.27 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
7th
Uzbekistan rank
8th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Uzbekistan
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 2.37 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 2.27 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 95.82 million current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 8th of 185 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 760.58 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.31 million current LCU per square kilometre 759.28 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 942.51 million current LCU per square kilometre 29.88 million current LCU per square kilometre 912.64 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 1.69 billion current LCU per square kilometre 495.33 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.19 billion current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 2.17 billion current LCU per square kilometre 1.73 billion current LCU per square kilometre 434.36 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Uzbekistan?
Hong Kong, at 2.37 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 2.27 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Uzbekistan?
95.82 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Uzbekistan rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 8th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Uzbekistan: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/uzbekistan/">Hong Kong vs Uzbekistan: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.