Guatemala vs Honduras: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Guatemala
7.51 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras
7.70 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
105th
Honduras rank
104th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Honduras
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 7.70 million current LCU per square kilometre against 7.51 million current LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 180,820 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 105th and Honduras ranks 104th of 185 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Honduras Difference Ahead
1960s 11,440 current LCU per square kilometre 9,296 current LCU per square kilometre 2,144 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 30,250 current LCU per square kilometre 21,972 current LCU per square kilometre 8,278 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 112,115 current LCU per square kilometre 67,152 current LCU per square kilometre 44,963 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 699,464 current LCU per square kilometre 320,423 current LCU per square kilometre 379,041 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 1.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 390,741 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 4.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 373,566 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 6.45 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 27,620 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Honduras?
Honduras, at 7.70 million current LCU per square kilometre against 7.51 million current LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Honduras?
180,820 current LCU per square kilometre, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Honduras?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Honduras rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 105th and Honduras ranks 104th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Honduras: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/honduras/">Guatemala vs Honduras: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.