El Salvador vs Lesotho: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

El Salvador
1.63 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho
1.65 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
139th
Lesotho rank
138th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Lesotho
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 1.65 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.63 million current LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 21,480 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1965 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 139th and Lesotho ranks 138th of 185 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 5 and Lesotho in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Lesotho Difference Ahead
1960s 41,250 current LCU per square kilometre 1,829 current LCU per square kilometre 39,421 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1970s 81,208 current LCU per square kilometre 6,511 current LCU per square kilometre 74,697 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
1980s 150,866 current LCU per square kilometre 18,463 current LCU per square kilometre 132,403 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2000s 893,713 current LCU per square kilometre 602,758 current LCU per square kilometre 290,955 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2010s 1.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 52,688 current LCU per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 1.44 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 53,405 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 1.65 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.63 million current LCU per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Lesotho?
21,480 current LCU per square kilometre, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Lesotho?
34 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Lesotho rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 139th and Lesotho ranks 138th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Lesotho: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/lesotho/">El Salvador vs Lesotho: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.