Dominican Republic vs Tanzania: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Dominican Republic
111.41 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
133.69 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
36th
Tanzania rank
34th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Tanzania
050.0M100.0M150.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 133.69 million current LCU per square kilometre against 111.41 million current LCU per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, a difference of 22.28 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Dominican Republic's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 36th and Tanzania ranks 34th of 185 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 3.54 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.77 million current LCU per square kilometre 221,443 current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 16.97 million current LCU per square kilometre 18.36 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.39 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 53.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 73.35 million current LCU per square kilometre 20.28 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 94.78 million current LCU per square kilometre 119.58 million current LCU per square kilometre 24.80 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Dominican Republic or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 133.69 million current LCU per square kilometre against 111.41 million current LCU per square kilometre in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Dominican Republic and Tanzania?
22.28 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Tanzania rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Dominican Republic ranks 36th and Tanzania ranks 34th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Tanzania: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/dominican-republic/tanzania/">Dominican Republic vs Tanzania: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.