Denmark vs Malta: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Denmark
46.94 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
40.39 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
57th
Malta rank
58th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Denmark
  • Malta
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196619942023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 46.94 million current LCU per square kilometre against 40.39 million current LCU per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 6.55 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 57th and Malta ranks 58th of 185 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 4.52 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.25 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.27 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 12.03 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.36 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.68 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 19.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.96 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 28.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 13.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.23 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 37.29 million current LCU per square kilometre 21.36 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.93 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 44.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 33.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.44 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Denmark or Malta?
Denmark, at 46.94 million current LCU per square kilometre against 40.39 million current LCU per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Denmark and Malta?
6.55 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Malta?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Malta rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Denmark ranks 57th and Malta ranks 58th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Malta: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/denmark/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/denmark/malta/">Denmark vs Malta: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.