Democratic Republic of Congo vs Denmark: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Democratic Republic of Congo
51.62 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark
46.94 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
54th
Denmark rank
57th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Denmark
020.0M40.0M60.0M196619942023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 51.62 million current LCU per square kilometre against 46.94 million current LCU per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Denmark ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 54th and Denmark ranks 57th of 185 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Denmark Difference Ahead
1990s 4,938 current LCU per square kilometre 20.67 million current LCU per square kilometre 20.66 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 2.54 million current LCU per square kilometre 28.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 25.76 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 14.70 million current LCU per square kilometre 37.29 million current LCU per square kilometre 22.58 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 39.71 million current LCU per square kilometre 44.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.23 million current LCU per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Democratic Republic of Congo or Denmark?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 51.62 million current LCU per square kilometre against 46.94 million current LCU per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark?
4.68 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Denmark rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 54th and Denmark ranks 57th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Denmark: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/denmark/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Denmark: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.