Colombia vs Uganda: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Colombia
1.26 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
740.85 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
9th
Uganda rank
11th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • Uganda
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196119922023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 1.26 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 740.85 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 520.00 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.7 times Uganda's.

Across all 51 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 9th and Uganda ranks 11th of 185 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 48,798 current LCU per square kilometre 259.72 current LCU per square kilometre 48,538 current LCU per square kilometre Colombia
1980s 4.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 924,191 current LCU per square kilometre 4.02 million current LCU per square kilometre Colombia
1990s 61.14 million current LCU per square kilometre 22.29 million current LCU per square kilometre 38.85 million current LCU per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 251.10 million current LCU per square kilometre 83.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 167.98 million current LCU per square kilometre Colombia
2010s 586.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 364.85 million current LCU per square kilometre 221.36 million current LCU per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 1.04 billion current LCU per square kilometre 641.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 400.78 million current LCU per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Colombia or Uganda?
Colombia, at 1.26 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 740.85 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Colombia and Uganda?
520.00 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Uganda?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Uganda rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 9th and Uganda ranks 11th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Uganda: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/colombia/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/colombia/uganda/">Colombia vs Uganda: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.