China vs Honduras: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

China
7.82 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras
7.70 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
103rd
Honduras rank
104th

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Honduras
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 7.82 million current LCU per square kilometre against 7.70 million current LCU per square kilometre in Honduras, a difference of 129,590 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 103rd and Honduras ranks 104th of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and Honduras in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Honduras Difference Ahead
1960s 12,316 current LCU per square kilometre 9,296 current LCU per square kilometre 3,020 current LCU per square kilometre China
1970s 20,212 current LCU per square kilometre 21,972 current LCU per square kilometre 1,760 current LCU per square kilometre Honduras
1980s 63,489 current LCU per square kilometre 67,152 current LCU per square kilometre 3,663 current LCU per square kilometre Honduras
1990s 350,326 current LCU per square kilometre 320,423 current LCU per square kilometre 29,903 current LCU per square kilometre China
2000s 1.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 341,807 current LCU per square kilometre Honduras
2010s 4.01 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 253,398 current LCU per square kilometre China
2020s 6.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 568,648 current LCU per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, China or Honduras?
China, at 7.82 million current LCU per square kilometre against 7.70 million current LCU per square kilometre in Honduras as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between China and Honduras?
129,590 current LCU per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Honduras?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Honduras rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
China ranks 103rd and Honduras ranks 104th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Honduras: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/china/honduras/">China vs Honduras: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.