Brazil vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Brazil
1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
1.24 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
146th
New Zealand rank
143rd

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • New Zealand
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1.24 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 171,720 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 146th and New Zealand ranks 143rd of 185 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil New Zealand Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 34,900 current LCU per square kilometre 34,900 current LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.0039 current LCU per square kilometre 138,533 current LCU per square kilometre 138,533 current LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 49,964 current LCU per square kilometre 269,033 current LCU per square kilometre 219,069 current LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 205,670 current LCU per square kilometre 456,109 current LCU per square kilometre 250,439 current LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 568,753 current LCU per square kilometre 741,157 current LCU per square kilometre 172,404 current LCU per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 918,889 current LCU per square kilometre 1.11 million current LCU per square kilometre 195,274 current LCU per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Brazil or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1.24 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.07 million current LCU per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Brazil and New Zealand?
171,720 current LCU per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and New Zealand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Brazil and New Zealand rank globally for final consumption expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 146th and New Zealand ranks 143rd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/final-consumption-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/brazil/new-zealand/">Brazil vs New Zealand: Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
185 places, 8,200 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Final consumption expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.